• Home
  • Staff
  • Professional Services +
    • Fiscal Impact Analyses +
      • Growth Alternatives Analyses
      • Development Proposals
      • Annexation Proposals
      • Fiscal Equity Studies
    • Impact Fees
    • Utility Rate Studies
    • Revenue Enhancement/Infrastructure Financing
    • User Fee/Cost of Service Studies
    • Cost Allocation Plans
    • Capital Improvement Plans
    • Economic Impact and Market Analyses
    • Fiscal Software
  • Newsletters
  • Publications
  • Client Map
  • Contact Us
L. Carson Bise II, AICP, President
Experience
Carson Bise has 20 years of fiscal, economic and planning experience and has conducted fiscal and infrastructure finance evaluations in 25 states. Mr. Bise has developed and implemented more fiscal impact models than any consultant in the country. The applications he has developed have been used for evaluating multiple land use scenarios, specific development projects, annexations, urban service provision, tax-increment financing and concurrency/adequate public facilities monitoring. Mr. Bise is also a leading national figure in the calculation of impact fees, having completed over 150 impact fees for the following categories: parks and recreation, open space, police, fire, schools, water, sewer, roads, municipal power and general government facilities. In his six years as a planner at the local government level, he coordinated capital improvement plans, conducted market analyses and business development strategies, and developed comprehensive plans.

Mr. Bise has also written and lectured extensively on fiscal impact analysis and infrastructure financing. His most recent publications are Fiscal Impact Analysis: Methodologies for Planners, published by the American Planning Association, a chapter on fiscal impact analysis in the book Planning and Urban Design Standards, also published by the American Planning Association, and the ICMA IQ Report, Fiscal Impact Analysis: How Today’s Decisions Affect Tomorrow’s Budgets. Mr. Bise was also the principal author of the fiscal impact analysis component for the Atlanta Regional Commission’s Smart Growth Toolkit and is featured in the recently released AICP CD-ROM Training Package entitled The Economics of Density. Mr. Bise is currently on the Board of Directors of the Growth and Infrastructure Consortium and recently Chaired the American Planning Association’s Paying for Growth Task Force.

Selected Fiscal Impact Analysis Experience
  • Anchorage, Alaska - Fiscal Impact Analysis of General Plan Alternatives
  • Matsu Borough, Alaska - Fiscal Impact Analysis
  • Town of Sahuarita, Arizona - Fiscal Impact Model
  • Shelby County, Tennessee - Fiscal Equity Study
  • City of Germantown, Tennessee - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Annexation Alternatives
  • Know County, Tennessee - Fiscal Equity Study
  • Clovis, California - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Annexation Alternatives
  • Mesa County, Colorado - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios
  • City of Westminster, Colorado - Fiscal Impact Model
  • City of Steamboat Springs, Colorado - Cost of Land Uses Study
  • City of Kissimmee, Florida - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Annexation Areas
  • Hernando County, Florida - Fiscal Impact Analysis
  • Hillsborough County, Florida - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Current Land Use Trend
  • Miami-Dade County, Florida - Fiscal and Economic Analysis of Rural and Agricultural Areas
  • Sarasota County, Florida - Fiscal and Economic Analysis of Development Prototypes
  • Columbus Consolidated Government, Georgia - Fiscal Impact Analysis
  • City of Lawrence, Kansas - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios; Cost of Land Uses Study
  • City of Lenexa, Kansas - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios; Cost of Land Uses Study
  • City of Olathe, Kansas - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Blue River 12 Plan
  • Carroll County, Maryland - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios; Revenue Strategies; Fiscal Model
  • Calvert County, Maryland - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios
  • Charles County, Maryland - Cost of Land Use Study
  • Howard County, Maryland - Fiscal Impact Analysis of General Plan
  • Prince George's County, Maryland - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios; Revenue Strategies; Fiscal Model
  • City of Lee's Summit, Missouri - Long-Term Financial Model
  • Town of Salem, New Hampshire - Fiscal Impact Model
  • City of Wilson, North Carolina - Cost of Land Use Analysis and Revenue Strategies
  • City of Wilmington, North Carolina - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Urban Services Provision
  • Guilford County, North Carolina - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios
  • New Hanover County, North Carolina - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Urban Services Provision
  • City of Dublin, Ohio - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Land Use Scenarios
  • City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma- Fiscal Impact Analysis of Growth Scenarios; Fiscal Impact Model
  • City of Greeneville, South Carolina - Cost of Land Use Study
  • Beaufort County, South Carolina - Fiscal Impact Analysis of North Beaufort Plan
  • City of San Antonio, Texas - Cost of Land Use Study
  • City of Tyler, Texas - Cost of Land Use Study
  • City of Draper, Utah - Fiscal Impact Analysis of SunCrest Development Project
  • City of Chesapeake, Virginia - Fiscal Impact Model
  • Frederick County, Virginia - Development Impact Model
  • City of Sun Prairie, Wisconsin - Fiscal Impact Analysis of Three Growth Scenarios
Selected Impact Fee & Infrastructure Funding Strategy Experience
  • City of Daphne, Alabama - Impact Fee Study
  • City of Gulfshores, Alabama - Impact Fee Study
  • City of Orange Beach, Alabama - Impact Fee Study
  • Town of Camp Verde, Arizona - Development Fee Study
  • Pinal County, Arizona - Development Fee Study
  • City of Eloy, Arizona - Impact Fee Study
  • City of Siloam Springs, Arkansas - Development Impact Fee Study
  • City of Avenal, California - Development Impact Fee Study
  • City of Banning, California - Development Impact Fee Study
  • City of Corcoran, California - Development Impact Fee Study
  • City of Hemet, California - Development Impact Fee Study
  • City of Grass Valley, California - Development Impact Fee Study
  • City of National City, California - Development Impact Fee Study
  • City of Rancho Cucamonga, California - Development Impact Fee Study
  • Butte County, California - Development Impact Fee Study
  • City of Boulder, Colorado - Impact Fee/Excise Tax Study
  • Town of Castle Rock, Colorado - Impact Fee Study
  • City of Greeley, Colorado - Impact Fee Study
  • City of Steamboat Springs, Colorado - Impact Fee Study
  • Pasco County, Florida - School Impact Fee Study
  • Polk County, Florida - Impact Fee Study
  • Seminole County, Florida - School Impact Fee Study
  • Hailey, Idaho - Impact Fee Study
  • City of Olathe, Kansas - Interchange Funding Strategy
  • Calvert County, Maryland - Impact Fee Study
  • Carroll County, Maryland - Impact Fee Study
  • Charles County, Maryland - Impact Fee Study
  • Hagerstown, Maryland - Impact Fee Study
  • Town of Hampstead, Maryland - Impact Fee Study
  • Washington County, Maryland - Impact Fee Study
  • Worcester County, Maryland - Impact Fee Study
  • City of Greenville, North Carolina - Impact Fee Study
  • Wake County, North Carolina - Infrastructure Funding Strategy
  • City of Hagerstown, Maryland - Impact Fee Study
  • Abbeville County, South Carolina - Infrastructure Funding Strategy
  • Beaufort County, South Carolina - Infrastructure Funding Strategy
  • Clinton City, Utah - Impact Fee Study
  • Draper City, Utah - Impact Fee Study
  • Logan City, Utah - Impact Fee Study
Education
M.B.A., Economics, Shenandoah University
B.S. Geography/Urban Planning, East Tennessee State University
B.S. Political Science/Urban Studies, East Tennessee State University

Speaking Engagements
  • Fiscal Impact Assessment, AICP Training Workshop, American Planning Association National Planning Conference
  • Dealing with the Cost of Growth: From Soup to Nuts, International City/County Management Association National Conference
  • Demand Numbers for Impact Analysis, National Impact Fee Roundtable
  • Calculating Infrastructure Needs with Fiscal Impact Models, Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association Conference
  • Economic Impact of Home Building, National Impact Fee Roundtable
  • Annexation and Economic Development, American Planning Association National Conference
  • Economics of Density, American Planning Association National Conference
  • The Cost/Benefit of Compact Development Patterns, American Planning Association National Conference
  • Fiscal Impact Modeling: A Tool for Local Government Decision Making, International City/County Management Association National Conference
  • Fiscal Assessments, American Planning Association National Conference
  • From Soup to Nuts: Paying for Growth, American Planning Association National Conference
  • Growing Pains, International City/County Management Association National Conference
  • Fiscal Impact Analysis in Comprehensive Planning, Virginia Chapter of the American Planning Association Conference
  • Mitigating the Impacts of Development in Urban Areas, Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association
  • Impact Fee Basics, National Impact Fee Roundtable
  • Fiscal Impact Analysis and Impact Fees, National Impact Fee Roundtable
  • Are Subsidies Worth It?, American Planning Association National Conference
  • "Impact Fees and Cash Proffers, APA Virginia Annual Planning Conference
  • Paying for Growth, APA Virginia Annual Planning Conference
  • Fiscal Impact Analysis and Cash Proffers in Virginia Jurisdictions, APA Virginia Annual Planning Conference
Publications
  • Planning and Urban Design Standards, American Planning Association, Contributing Author on Fiscal Impact Analysis.
  • Fiscal Impact Analysis: How Today's Decisions Affect Tomorrow's Budgets, ICMA Press.
  • "The Cost/Contribution of Residential Development," Mid-Atlantic Builder.
  • "Are Subsidies Worth It?" Economic Development News & Views.
  • "Smart Growth and Fiscal Realities," ICMA Getting Smart! Newsletter.
  • "The Economics of Density," AICP Training Series, 2005, Training CD-ROM (American Planning Association)
Contact
L. Carson Bise II, AICP, President
carson@tischlerbise.com

Copyright © 2010 TischlerBise